Monday, February 13, 2012

Grammy Tributes and Shining Stars!

News accounts indicate that Whitney Houston Tributes and more Pushed the Grammy telecast, on CBS-TV Sunday, February 12th, 2012,  to the  Largest Audience Since 1984. 39 Million people tuned in to enjoy some of their favorite musical acts win, or at least to get a glimpse of some of the shining stars in the audience who didn't win.
It was great to see the Grammy Tributes to Whitney Houston, Etta James, Glen Campbell, and Beach Boys, as well as some other performances, like Taylor Swift and Adele, and the mention of Don Cornelius (Soul Train), who was influential in helping to popularize Soul/R&B. The Tony Bennett and Carrie Underwood duet was charming. It was also outstanding to see Wisconsin's Bon Iver (translation: Good Winter)  win two Grammy's for Best New Artist and Best Alternative Album (accepted by Justin Vernon).
Just a few complaints about the Grammy Award presentation broadcast on CBS-TV: (1) What's the deal with the noise that "mouse" was making at the end of the song by Foo Fighters? (2) Nicki Minaj's Roman Holiday was a waste of viewer minutes. She should've stayed in the audience, instead, wearing that silly red riding hood outfit. (3) I won't mention how unhappy I was to see woman-beater Chris Brown "performing" and, then winning a Grammy. What's with that?
On the eve of the 2009 Grammys, Chris Brown beat his then-girlfriend Rihanna, for which he later pled guilty to a charge of assault and was sentenced to five years of probation and six months of community labor. Brown has worked to repair his image, undergone domestic violence counseling. A restraining order required Brown to stay 50 yards away from 23-year-old Rihanna, but the restriction has since been reduced to 10 yards if they were at a music industry event. Rihanna also performed Sunday but the two never shared the stage.
Indulge me a fantasy: Wouldn't it have been fun to see Rhianna come on stage when Chris Brown was accepting the Grammy for Best R&B Album (F.A.M.E.: Forgiving All My Enemies) to get her revenge for the disgraceful beating he gave her three years ago by beating HIM senseless? Or, at the very least, rearranging his face? ...............Just a little bit??? Sorry, I forgot, it was a family show. We sure wouldn't want our impressionable children and the so-called "adults" in the viewing audience, or at the event,  to believe using their fists to harm another person is "acceptable", would we?
Maybe I'm just getting Crabby in my Advancing Age, or maybe, I'm Close to the Heart of the Matter, or Something Else.
Just Saying,


GARY W. MORGAN


Morbizco Media Group
WisconsinReport.com
USWebDaily.com
GreatGold.fm
GreatGoldHits.com
ClassicHitOldies.com
Clik2Go.com
Twitter Account

Friday, February 10, 2012

Those Who Control the Airwaves Control Our Thoughts And Actions

One of my Facebook Friends in the broadcasting industry recently posted something she had seen somewhere: "It won't come as a shock to the thousands that have felt the sting of radio's downsizing -- but it still hurts to see it in print. CBS MONEY WATCH asks, 'Will these 10 jobs disappear in 2012?' -- and Broadcast Announcer is #6 on the list."

That post prompted other Facebook Members to add their comments at the bottom of her post, and, it awoke an old pet peeve of mine. I don't often participate in these "added comments, but, this was one of the times I had to get something off my chest. So, I added some of my own comments as well, regarding the trend of fewer and fewer, live people manning broadcast booths at radio stations around the USA.  Unfortunately (or fortunately for the Facebook crowd), I didn't complete my written thoughts in Facebook, so, I'll do my best here:

Downsizing in Radio Broadcasting began when the FCC, many years ago, relaxed rules about how many stations one company could own. It has easily gotten to the point now where only a handful of companies own most of the stations in the United States. It's also often that one company owns all or most of the stations in cities which have multiple stations.

For starters, there are three things wrong with that scenario: (1) Too much control of information and one-sided political viewpoints. (2) One staff for many stations instead of many staffs for many stations. (3): There have been fewer and fewer Broadcast Announcer jobs each decade for several decades.

It can happen to anyone in Broadcasting at any moment. I hate to say it, but, I would not be surprised that there will be no actual people behind "live" microphones at any radio stations, anywhere in the U.S., except for Rush Limbaugh and others who mislead listeners with inaccurate, not fully truthful accounts of what is going on in the world.

Of course, sadly, that's probably what was planned all along, when multiple radio station ownership rules were changed. Did you notice, or realize, that most of the radio stations in this country are owned, managed and manned by people who lean toward the Republican Conservative side of the political spectrum? You can bet that's not by coincidence.

Control The Airwaves and You Ultimately Control How and What Your Listeners Think, especially if listeners have no other source for information and opinion. If listeners in any particular community, anywhere, are bombarded with a steady diet of Slanted Shock and Awe, It's logical that those listeners attitudes and thought processes will be changed. Do you think there's no connection?

As proof of my contention: There's a State Assembly Seat that had been held by a Democrat for more than three decades. During that time he was an excellent representative for the area, doing so with high ideals and constant concern for his constituents. Also, during the time he served in that capacity, the local radio station presented a variety of viewpoints, giving the listener accurate information about issues from as many sides as possible, so listeners could make up there own minds.

Then the station was sold; programming became all Republican, so-called "Conservative" views, all the time, and the minds of people began to change, until, a Republican was able to gain enough votes to overtake the veteran statesman. I'm sure an abundance of anti-incumbent advertising dollars had something to do with unseating the Democrat, but, this is about the undue influence wielded by the one-sided viewpoints coming from far too many radio stations around the country, and, it. unfortunately, being the ONLY viewpoint available in far too many communities.

It is logical that those who control the airwaves also control the thoughts and minds of men and women. If you tell people what to think often enough, they will soon believe it must be true, and the thoughts inside their heads are there own. And, they will act accordingly at the voting booth, often going against "common sense"; against the "logical"; against the "better choice"; and against "their own interest".

The sad thing is, it has been happening far too often, to a large degree because the average listener to local radio does not have more than one set of voices to listen to for the information they should be getting so they can make up their own minds. People have even been electing political office seekers who turn out to be, for example, Governors, Senators, and Representatives, who take rights away from the people who elected them. Through these actions, these elected officials threaten the way of life that we "all", deep down, want to continue.

Let's hope that people wake up to the reality that, if they are listening only to so-called "Conservative" talk radio and only viewing Fox-News, etc.,  they are not really in control of their own thoughts, nor of the urges to vote the way they do. It's best to hear news and opinion from more than one source, from more than one viewpoint, from more than one slant. Then, maybe, you'll actually come to a decision, an opinion, a thought, an action, that is based on having all of the information you need to come to a sane, rational and logical choice, not one that you were TOLD was the "right" choice.

The trouble is, most communities no longer have more than one commercial station providing news, information, opinion, conversation and talk programming. That situation is largely because a handful of companies own far-too-many radio stations and other news and information outlets in this country.

There must be diversification of ideas from all sides available to all of the residents of the United States, So We Can Keep The Freedoms This Country Was Built On. So we continue to have the FREEDOM to think the thoughts and do the things we want to do, because WE think it is the correct thing for us to think and do, not because we were duped into believing what that one-sided voice coming from our radio speaker drummed into us.

Something must be done about Multiple Radio Station Ownership Regulations. Those Who Control the Airwaves Control the Thoughts, Minds and Actions of Men and Women. That, at the very least, is Detrimental to the Well-Being of Our Democracy.

Just Saying,

GARY W. MORGAN

Morbizco Media Group
WisconsinReport.com
USWebDaily.com
GreatGold.fm
GreatGoldHits.com
ClassicHitOldies.com
Clik2Go.com
Twitter Account

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Kelly Ripa: Stay In The "Kelly Chair" Where You Really Shine

I had an unusual opportunity to watch the first half of Live with Kelly Ripa on television today. This prompted me to write a few words about my observations of how the show is doing from a production and a spectator level.

I have enjoyed the Regis and Kelly Live show off and on, whenever possible, ever since Kelly came to Regis' rescue after Kathy Lee left. I also watched from time to time when Kathy Lee was sitting in the "Kathy Lee Chair".

Kathy Lee was always a "hoot" and the chemistry between her and Regis Philbin was extraordinary. Few thought Kathy Lee could be replaced, but the audience crossed their fingers that it could be done, while Regis continued his steady and often humorous hand to inform and entertain, while a replacement was being sought.

The production finally landed a superb replacement to sit in the "Kathy Chair", in the form of Kelly Ripa, and, the team of Regis and Kelly settled into a well-oiled machine, entertaining and informing, only the way Kelly and Regis could. What a great hour to spend with two sort of "family members" for us in the viewing audience, nearly every day. What a feat to accomplish! 

Kelly was a great asset to "Live" back in the day when Raging Regis was the guy in the stage right seat at the start of the show (audience left) after Kathy Lee moved on to other things in her life. However, it had to come to an end, sooner or later. Nothing that enjoyable, especially the segment at the top of each show, could go on forever.

When Regis decided to "retire" after being on television for umpteen number of years, I, for one, was saddened, because Regis is a unique, wonderful talent who has left a hole, hard to be filled by anyone else. However, I knew, down deep, that Kelly could carry on, because I have great respect for her abilities to make the audience and guests feel extremely comfortable. Now, if only they could find someone to comfortably settle into the Regis Chair.

I don't have as much time available to watch the show every day since Regis retired, partly because, let's fqce it, I miss Regis and Kelly together. The combination of Regis and Kelly was "just right". On the other hand, I had a few moments today to check out the show.

I found that Kelly continues to be an asset to the show while trying to continue on without Regis, but, she's not Regis (of course no one is). It's just really difficult to see her in the seat occupied by Regis, so well, at the beginning of the show. I, personally feel more at ease when she's sitting stage left (audience right), in the Kelly Chair, at the beginning of each episode.

They complimented each others efforts to be entertaining and informative, everyday. I understand that there comes a time for everyone to want to retire, but, it will, indeed, be very difficult to come up with an on-camera match for Kelly's talents to be fully realized on "Live" again. Take your time, production staff and producers, and everyone else in on the decision, until you have the right person for that Regis Chair.

In the meantime, for goodness sakes, from the point of view of an appreciative viewer and an experienced broadcaster, Kelly, make yourself more comfortable in your current role, and the audience more comfortable when watching:

Take the seat that is the "Kelly Chair", because, it would be hard for anyone else to fill that seat, now that you've spent so many years making the Kelly Chair your own place to "shine" most, even more than you do when you try to fill the "Regis Chair". Let someone else make the Regis Chair, their own chair, just like you put in your time and energy to make the Kelly Chair, your own.

Just Saying,

GARY W. MORGAN

Morbizco Media Group
Morbizco.com
WisconsinReport.com
USWebDaily.com
GreatGold.fm
GreatGoldHits.com
ClassicHitOldies.com
Clik2Go.com